I am - Lily Cole Naked for Paradis Magazine of the Day
So if you don’t know, Lily Cole is a 19 year old model and now you know. These are nude pictures of her for some magazine called Paradis. I am all for chicks getting naked, for whatever reason, whether it’s to take a shit or to get boys to pay attention to them because their dad never did or because they are nudists or even when it’s for art. As long as I see some pussy, even when they have orange pubic hair and flat asses. I’m happy.
The only problem I have with this naked for art and fashion bullshit is that I am not down with the double standard. I post tits on my site everyday and I’m called a porn site and get blocked in schools and offices around the world and shut down by paypal and can’t secure advertisers but when Lily Cole shows off her pussy in a magazine, they end up luring in million dollar ad deals because shit’s considered edgy or artistic because a famous model is being the slut and not some hotter but trashier chick from Florida taking a load inside her.
They call that shit porn, but for those of you who don’t know, which is probaly 95% of you losers, the first step to cumming in a chick is having her get naked. So maybe Europe is more liberal, maybe I’d do well there, but that doesn’t change that you conservative motherfucker’s who are trying to shut me down have probably already closed this post so that your bosses don’t see you lookin’ at vagina when you’re on the clock. I guess it’s all about context, but I’ll still keep on keepin on, because I have nothing better to do.
Related Posts:
Lydia Hearst for Puma
Gemma Ward is a Model I Want to Marry
Jessica Stam is a Model with a Mustache
Miranda Kerr is a Model in a Bikini
May 6th, 2008 at 9:37 am
Your comments are fair enough, artistic nudity is basically still porn despite the liberal bullshit attitude that it’s all Ok…
May 6th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
Agreed. What kinda bullshit “art” magazine is this, anyways? Unless these photos were scanned straight from the pages, the quality is horrendous, and the poses are extremely unimaginative, and shouldn’t be classified as art; rather they look like pictures that this chick’s horny boyfriend could have taken at some long-forgotten shack out in the middle of the desert.
May 19th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
I’m with you, man. WTF is this? These look like some dude just used a disposable camera and took random shots of her naked. The lighting is absolutely terrible!! These aren’t even artistic. I only saw one or two artistic nudes. These look like she got drunk and let someone photograph her. The really bad quality photos are the ones of her in the dirt and on the bed. And what’s with the up-close shots of her vag? Those are artistic? They look like pictures I saw in a medical book once for some kind of condition.
P.S. As a commercial photographer, there really is a difference between dirty and artistic, especially if it’s porn aka penetration or otherwise. It’s all about the position of the body and usually about the dramatic lighting against the skin. Black and whites are usually more appropriate for that.
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:27 pm
You’re a fuckin moron. I really don’t care about the content of your comment but you amazingly manage to backflip your argument about four times in the space of a paragraph. Just leaves me baffled as to what your actually bitching your sorry little ass of about…………