MSN CANADA DOES KIDDY PORN AND AUDI SUPPORTS IT OF THE DAY
MSN, Canada, Kiddy Porn
MSN CANADA DOES KIDDY PORN AND AUDI SUPPORTS IT OF THE DAY
I am not a hippie or anything, so I don’t want you to get me wrong in my hatred of corporations. The reason I hate corporations is not because I view them as “the man”, it is because of the double standards that lie between corporations and people like me. It’s like they are untouchable. If I was to post a picture of Brooke Shields in a sheer lacy top when she was 13 years old, I’d go to fuckin’ jail, but when MSN does it, they get advertisers like Audi up on board, paying INSANE prices just to be there, while I can’t manage to even find a porn advertiser willing to give me 50 fuckin’ dollars. I am not saying my site is comparable to an MSN celebrity site, but if it was, then maybe I could afford to pay the fucking paparazzi for fucking images and all my troubles would be behind me.
The truth is that this post wasn’t intended to be a bitchfest, you know, me whining about how I am wronged by the system, and it was supposed to be about how the editors at MSN knowingly put an inappropriate picture of Brooke Shields on their site, one that kids and parents alike visit, and that to me is unacceptable, what is more unacceptable is that advertisers embrace this shit and the content this site produces, and discounts anyone who does less offensive shit, becaue they aren’t a billion dollar company. The world may be corrupt, but I feel better that I got the chance to call these fuckers out on being kiddy porn peddlers that I doubt will get the FBI knocking on their door over….
To see if I have the power to make MSN take down an image, follow this link, if it’s dead, you know they are trying to cover up the fact that they post sexually provocative pictures of 13 year olds….
GO
September 24th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Her prifiles and hot photos were found on ♥♥♥ wealthyromanceS.Com ♥♥♥ 2 weeks ago. It is an online dating service where wealthy singles can join who are looking for younger unattached people to enjoy their wealthy lifestyle with.
September 24th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
I absolutely agree with you. I like Brooke Shields myself, but why was there never anything done about the exploitation when she was younger. The most outrageous things to me was that she was allowed to be filmed nude at 12 or 13 in the movie “Pretty Baby” and that isn’t considered wrong to whomever is in charge of seeing things like that doesn’t happen. I know that was back in the 1970’s, but there were still laws around to protect kids from being exploited like that.
I also wanted to note that I have been reading all over the place that the FBI is investigating some possibly stolen photos of Jamie Lynn Spears breastfeeding. Ok, so the FBI is warning that anyone who may be trying to sell or buy those photos are in danger of being arrested for child porn. I guess the laws can be stretched enough to make that stick. My question, though, is why is her husband not being arrested for possession of child porn if those photos are being considered that? It was noted that he took the camera to Wal-Mart to get the pics developed. The whole thing sounds like a big scare tactic to keep the photos off the web.
Seriously, video stores can still rent or sell “Pretty Baby”, a movie with a under 14 girl naked and playing a prostitute, but if the tabloids offer to buy they pic of a 17 year old popping a boob to feed their baby, they can be arrested?
I also get a kick out of the fact that if 2 girls are sitting in a public place and 1 has a baby, she can pop out her boobs and it’s supposed to be fine (in fact, if anyone objects, that person is usually the one seen as being in the wrong). If the other girl just decides she is getting too hot and takes off her shirt, she can be cited with indecent exposure (depending on where you live). How bad is that?
In case it came across different, I agree that the Jamie Lynn photos should be kept private, at the least, but if it is a matter of law, then the movie should also not be allowed.
September 24th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
btw, when pretty baby came out, tom snyder showed a pic of brooke shields topless
he was never busted for kiddie porn
September 24th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
I would definitely fuck the pre-legal age brooke over the legal age brooke.
I mean, she was a hooker, right?
September 24th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
If I remember correctly, women in Toronto can pop their boobs out when ever they want, just as long as making money isn’t involved. It’s been legal for a few years but it doesn’t seem to have taken off.
Doesn’t matter what age Brooke is, I can’t get around them eyebrowels. They don’t clean up too nicely. Madonna’s kid should have better luck under the electrolysis needle, though.
Hugs and kisses!
Fucking Fucker
September 25th, 2008 at 4:06 am
Children were so exploited in the 70’s and 80’s,
and Brooke Shields was no exception to that rule.
MSN should know better,than to post such a pic.
Fuck MSN,Yahoo is better anyways.lol
September 25th, 2008 at 6:30 am
Fuck. Thanks Jesus. I saw that picture you posted of Brooke Sheilds at 13 and had to do the 5 knuckle shuffle on my trouser snake. Then I popped in my copy of Pretty Baby and spanked it for another hour and a half. Now I’m chafing. You suck Jesus!